Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience Papers in Press available online.

Satisfaction survey on antipsychotic formulations by schizophrenia patients in Japan
Masakazu Hatano 1,2,3,*, Ippei Takeuchi 3,4, Kanade Yamashita 3, Aoi Morita 3, Kaori Tozawa 3,5, Takashi Sakakibara 3,6, Genta Hajitsu 3,7, Manako Hanya 3, Shigeki Yamada 2, Nakao Iwata 1, Hiroyuki Kamei 1,3
1Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan, 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan, 3Office of Clinical Pharmacy Practice and Health Care Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 4Department of Psychiatry, Okehazama Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan, 5Department of Psychiatry, Kyowa Hospital, Obu, Aichi, Japan, 6Department of Psychiatry, Holy Cross Hospital, Toki, Gifu, Japan, 7Department of Psychiatry, Kamibayashikinen Hospital, Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan
Objective: To identify factors affecting adherence to medication, a subjective questionnaire survey was administered to schizophrenia patients regarding the prescribed antipsychotic formulations.
Methods: We evaluated the patients’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction with prescribed antipsychotic formulations, and patients answered the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 Questionnaire (DAI-10). Inclusion criteria for patients are as follows: age between 20 and 75 years and taking antipsychotic agents containing the same ingredients and formulations, for at least 1 month.
Results: In total, 301 patients answered the questionnaire survey. Tablets were found to be the most commonly used antipsychotic formulations among schizophrenia patients (n = 174, 57.8 %), followed by long-acting injections (LAIs, n = 93, 30.9 %). No significant differences in the formulation satisfaction level and DAI-10 scores were observed between all formulations. Formulations, except for LAI, were selected by physicians in more than half of the patients. Patients who answered “Decided by consultation with physicians” had significantly higher satisfaction levels and DAI-10 scores compared to those who answered “Decided by physicians” (4.11  0.77 vs. 3.80  1.00, p = 0.0073 and 6.20  3.51 vs. 4.39  4.56, p < 0.001, respectively). Satisfaction levels moderately correlated with DAI-10 scores (r = 0.48, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: No formulation had a high satisfaction level in all patients, and it is important to be reflect the patients’ individual preferences in pharmacotherapy. Shared decision-making in the selection of the formulations is seen to be useful for improving medication adherence.
Accepted Manuscript [Submitted on 2020-07-21, Accepted on 2020-09-08]