2024; 22(4): 594-609  https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.24.1167
Feasibility of Using Serum, Plasma, and Platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine as Peripheral Biomarker for the Depression Diagnosis and Response Evaluation to Antidepressants: Animal Experimental Study
Zuanjun Su1,2,*, Zhicong Chen1,2,*, Jinming Cao1,2, Canye Li1,2, Jingjing Duan2, Ting Zhou1, Zhen Yang2, Yuanchi Cheng2, Zhijun Xiao1, Feng Xu1
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Fengxian Hospital and School of Pharmaceutical Science, Southern Medical University, Shanghai, China
2Department of Pharmacology, Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
Correspondence to: Feng Xu
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Fengxian Hospital and School of Pharmaceutical Science, Southern Medical University, 6600 Nanfeng Hwy, Shanghai 201499, China
E-mail: xuf@smu.edu.cn
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-8696

*These authors contributed equally to this study.
Received: January 18, 2024; Revised: March 11, 2024; Accepted: March 29, 2024; Published online: May 3, 2024.
© The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Objective: Whether peripheral blood 5-hydroxytrptamine (5-HT) levels serve as biomarker for depression diagnosis/response evaluation has not been well determined. This work was explored to address this inconclusive issue.
Methods: Animals were randomized into normal control group (NC, n = 10) and chronic unpredictable mild stress model group (CUMS-model, n = 20), respectively. Animals in CUMS-model group were subjected to chronic stress, then they were randomly subdivided into CUMS subgroup and CUMS + fluoxetine subgroup (CUMS + FLX). After FLX treatment, blood and tissues were collected. 5-HT and relevant protein expression were measured.
Results: In mice model, there was a significant increase in serum and a significant reduction in plasma 5-HT levels in CUMS-model group versus NC group, while platelet 5-HT levels change little. After FLX treatment, serum and platelet 5-HT levels were significantly decreased in CUMS + FLX subgroup, while plasma 5-HT levels had not much change versus CUMS subgroup. Chronic stress enhanced colon and platelet serotonin transporter (SERT) expression and FLX treatment mitigated SERT expression. In rats’ model, there was a significant increase in serum 5-HT levels while plasma and platelet 5-HT levels showed little change in CUMS group versus NC group. After FLX treatment, serum, plasma and platelet 5-HT levels were significantly decreased in CUMS + FLX subgroup versus CUMS subgroup. The profile of relevant proteins expression changed by FLX were like those in mice.
Conclusion: Serum 5-HT levels might serve as a potential biomarker for depression diagnosis, meanwhile serum and platelet 5-HT levels might respond to antidepressant treatment.
Keywords: Serotonin; Depression; Biomarkers; Chronic unpredictable mild stress; Fluoxetine
INTRODUCTION

Depression stands as a pervasive global mental health challenge, impacting approximately 5% of the world’s population as estimated by the World Health Organi-zation. Recent studies unveil an alarming surge, revealing a global prevalence rate of 27.6% for depression, an escalation poised to designate it as the primary cause of disease burden by 2030 [1-3]. The roots of depression are intricate, involving a multitude of factors such as genetics, environment, immunity, neurogenesis, biogenic amine depletion, and endocrine dysfunction in its pathogenesis [4,5]. The hypothesis of depression, initially introduced in the 1960s, laid a crucial foundation for depression medication [6]. With the advent of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs) in the 1990s, this hypothesis gained broader acceptance among basic and clinical researchers [7-9]. This theory posits that depression arises from a decrease in 5-HT release within the central nervous system and a reduction in its synaptic gap concentration. 5-HT, a monoamine neurotransmitter, accumulates within nerve endings facilitated by the 5-HT transporter (SERT). This transporter shuttles 5-HT into the cytoplasm to replenish synaptic vesicles, thereby terminating its extracellular effects. The regulatory role of 5-HT spans human behaviors, mood, memory, and its involvement in treating psychiatric and neurological disorders. Consequently, it plays a pivotal role in both the development and treatment of depression. By impeding the SERT in the presynaptic membrane, the inhibition of presynaptic 5-HT reuptake toward the synaptic gap amplifies the impact of 5-HT on postsynaptic 5-HT receptors. This action facilitates the binding of 5-HT to the 5-HT1 receptor, thereby exerting antidepressant and anxiolytic effects [10].

For a long time, however, depression diagnosis and response evaluation to antidepressants predominantly rely on clinical manifestations and scales, lacking objective laboratory diagnostic indicators [11,12]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 5-HT levels hold promise as deal biomarker for investigating brain-related illnesses due to its contact with interstitial fluid [13]. However, its invasive nature and associated risks, coupled with a scarcity of large-scale studies, limit its widespread use. Hence, the assessment of peripheral 5-HT levels emerges as the preferable clinical approach. In 1987, Sarrias et al. [14] proposed plasma 5-HT levels as a potential diagnostic tool for depression. Drawing from their physiological origin, structural and functional parallels, plasma 5-HT levels have been conjectured to mirror the 5-HT levels in neurosynaptic gap, while platelet 5-HT levels reflect 5-HT levels in central neurons [15]. Unfortunately, great difference in reference was noted between peripheral 5-HT levels and depression diagnosis and response assessment to antidepressants both in clinical evidence and animal experiments [16-19]. For instance, an extensive observational cohort study among postmenopausal woman revealed that depressed individuals displayed lower plasma 5-HT levels. However, this disparity did not attain statistical signifi-cance after adjusting for multiple comparisons. One study reported a significant decrease in serum 5-HT levels in Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rats compared to the normal control group [20], the other found no significant difference in serum 5-HT levels between CUMS rats and the normal control group [21]. Moreover, a meta-analysis encompassing 19 studies on 5-HIAA in CSF failed to establish a correlation between depression and concentrations of 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid, the primary metabolite of 5-HT [22]. Therefore, systematic research is needed to obtain more evidence to validate and confirm the potential clinical value of specific peripheral 5-HT test. To address the inconclusive clinical issue, this article explores the feasibility of using 5-HT levels in serum, plasma, and platelets as peripheral biomarkers for depression diagnosis and response evaluation to antidepressants with animal depression models.

METHODS

Animals

This research received approval from the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai Jiaotong University and was conducted under the oversight of the hospital’s Review Committee (No. 2022-0334). Thirty female C57BL/6 mice (18−20 g, aged 5−7 weeks) and 30 female Sprague-Dawley rats (160−200 g, aged 8−10 weeks) were procured from Jiangsu Huachuang Xinnuo Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (License No: SCXK 2020-0009). The animals were accommodated in a standard laboratory environment with a 12-hour light (06:00−18:00) and dark (18:00−06:00) cycle, maintaining temperatures between 22−25°C and relative humidity ranging from 40% to 70%. All animals were fed ordinary food by specific person and get their food and drink freely for 7 days acclimatization period before commencing the experiment.

Depression-like Behavior Animal Models Establishment, Fluoxetine Treatment and Sample Collection Workflow

CUMS-induced depression animal model was established according to the protocol [23]. After 1 week of acclimation, thirty mice and rats were randomly assigned into two groups using a random number table respectively. No intervention was given to the control group animals (NC group, n = 10) while animals in the other group (CUMS group, n = 20) was subjected to CUMS for 4 weeks in mice and 15 weeks in rats. The stressors included: swimming at 4°C or at 45°C for 5 minutes; cage vibration for 20 minutes; restraint stress for 3 hours; damp bedding for 12 hours; noise interference (85 dB) for 1.5 hours; cycle disturbances; cage tilting (45°) for 12 hours; no sawdust for 12 hours. Two stressors were used per day, and each stressor was not used consecutively for two days. The schedule of the stressors was shown in Table 1. Animal subjected to CUMS was housed separately in a single cage, while others were housed in groups. After model establishment, the modeled animals (n = 20) were further stratified into two sub-groups: CUMS group (n = 10) and CUMS + fluoxetine (FLX) group (n = 10). Then animals in the NC group (n = 10) and CUMS group (n = 10) were gavaged an equal volume of drinking water daily while animals in CUMS + FLX (n = 10) group were gavaged with FLX of 10 mg/ml/d for 28-day. Blood samples were collected at the end of model establishment and drug administration, respectively. The animals’ weights were recorded weekly. After drug administration, animals were sacrificed and hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and colon tissues were collected. The 5-HT levels in blood and tissue were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Additionally, 5-HT-associated proteins in tissue and platelets such as SERT, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1), TPH2, and 5-HT1A were identified via Western blotting. The entire experimental procedure was illustrated in Figure 1.

Behaviors Tests

Behavioral tests including sucrose preference test (SPT), open field test (OFT), tail suspension test (TST), and forced swimming test (FST) were performed to validate the depression-behavior models. These tests were usually conducted between 9:00 and 14:00.

SPT: Animal was individually housed in separate cage, and water drinking training was implemented. Briefly, for mouse, one bottle containing a 1.5% sucrose solution alongside the other bottle of drinking water were supplied for 48 hours. For rat, two bottles of 1.5% sucrose water were supplied for the initial 24 hours, followed by one bottle of 1.5% sucrose water and the other bottle of drinking water for the subsequent 24 hours. Sucrose preference was calculated as follows: sucrose preference (%) = [amount of sucrose solution consumed/(amount of sucrose solution consumed + amount of drinking water consumed)] × 100%.

OFT: All animals were given 0.5 hour acclimatization period in the test room before the test. Once initiated, each animal was individually taken from cage and introduced into the central area of the field. Tracking Master V3.0 (ZSDC Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.) was employed to monitor its activity within the field for a duration of 5 minutes. After the test, the field was wiped with alcohol to eliminate any residual odor and mitigate its potential influence on subsequent animal assessment.

TST: This test is only conducted in mice. All mice were given 0.5 hour acclimatization period in the test room before the test. Each mouse was caught from cage, and the tail was secured to hook and suspended in an inverted position with 30 cm distance between the head and the bottom of the enclosure. Tracking Master V3.0 was employed to record the immobilization time of mice in the last 4 minutes of the 6-minute test.

FST: The animal was placed in transparent cylindrical buckets with a water level of 30 cm for mouse and 60 cm for rat (the water temperature was 23−25°C, and the rat was trained to swim one day in advance). Tracking Master V3.0 was employed to record the immobility time of the animal in the last 4 minutes of the 5-minute test.

Blood and Tissues Sample Preparation and Measurement

Animals were kept unconscious with isoflurane for gas anesthesia. The orbital venous plexus blood was collected by glass capillary at 10:00 am. One part of the blood was kept in a regular EP tube and the other part was kept in an eppendorf (EP) tube containing anticoagulant citrate dextrose (ACD) (1 ml/6 ml whole blood). Blood in regular EP tube was allowed to clot for 2 hours at room temperature, centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 minutes, and the upper supernatant (serum) was stored at −80°C. Blood in EP tube (with ACD) was centrifuged at 800 rpm for 20 minutes, the supernatant platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was collected and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 20 minutes, yielding platelet poor plasma (PPP, later for short, plasma). The plasma was collected and stored at −80°C. The remaining white precipitate at the bottom was hypotonically ruptured by adding 50 μl of double-distilled water and stored at −80°C. The remaining PRP was used for platelet counting, with the PRP volume and platelet number recorded for analysis.

Blood sample (50 μl of serum, plasma) was mixed with 100 μl of acetonitrile, while platelets were repeatedly frozen and thawed three times and mixed with 100 μl of acetonitrile, then samples were vortex-mixed for 30 seconds to precipitate the proteins and were centrifuged at 14,800 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was filtered through a needle filter, then 80 μl was extracted into the injection bottle with 1.6 μl of 3,4-dihydroxybutyric acid (DHBA, internal standard, IS, 10 μg/ml), and then 2 μl of the supernatant was injected into the LC-MS/MS system.

After the animals were sacrificed, cerebral cortex, hippocampus and colon were collected and stored at −80°C. The cerebral cortex and hippocampus samples were homogenized with 0.1 ml water for 10 seconds using a Tissue homogenizer (Next Advance, Inc.). To prevent possible protein degradation, the homogenization was performed in ice bath. The total volume of each homogenate was equal to the sum of the brain sample weight (g)/(1 g/ml) and 0.1 ml (the volume of solvent added for homogenization), as the density of brain tissue is approximately 1 g/ml. An aliquot of 50 μl brain homogenate was mixed with 100 μl acetonitrile to precipitate protein. Then the mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 4°C, 14,800 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was collected and 80 μl was extracted into the injection bottle with 1.6 μl of DHBA (internal standard, IS, 10 μg/ml), and then 2 μl of the supernatant was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Colon samples were prepared as the same method for brain homogenates.

5-HT levels were measured with LC-MS/MS system (1290 Infinity LC, 6530 UHD and Accurate-Mass Q-TOF/MS; Agilent Technologies) according to reference [24]. The chromatographic separation conditions were as follows: chromatographic column: C18 column (Agilent, 4.6 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm). Sample was eluted in the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min at 25°C: H2O with 0.1% methane acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% methane acid (B). Gradient elution values as follows: The column was ramped from 45 to 70% B from 0−2 minutes, maintained at 100% B from 2.1−3.0 minutes, kept at 45% B from 3.1−5.0 minutes. For MS/MS detection transitions m/z 177.2 → 160.1 and m/z 153.0 → 109.0 for 5-HT and the IS were followed, respectively. The ion source was kept at 4,000 V and at 350°C in positive ion mode. The heater gases were set at 11 L/min, while the collision gas was set to 9. The scanning mode employed was multiple reaction monitoring. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, and precision and was fit for the intended purpose.

Cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and colon tissues were ground in RIPA buffer at 4°C with pre-added 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The mixture was allowed to incubate for 30 minutes before undergoing centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. Proteins within the platelets were extracted using a specialized platelet protein extraction kit. The supernatant above was quantified using the BCA protein assay kit (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), analyzed by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; NCM Biotech), and transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter membrane (Pall Corporation). After 1 hour of blocking, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibody (5-HT1A, TPH1, TPH2 antibody were purchased from Immunoway, GAPDH and SERT antibody were purchased from ABclonal Inc.; dilution rate: 5-HT1A, TPH1, TPH2 and SERT were 1:1,000, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH] was 1:10,000) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit antibody and goat anti-mouse antibody were purchased from ImmunoWay Biotechnology Company; dilution rate: goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse were 1:10,000), and detected with an enhanced chemilumin-escence (ECL) buffer (NCM Biotech). The intensity of each band was determined by ImageJ software.

Data Analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean. Comparisons between two groups were performed using the two independent samples ttest (Wilcoxon rank test was performed when the parameter test was not satisfied). Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test. pvalue < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Chronic Stress-induced Depression-like Behavior Models Validation and Effects of FLX in Mice and Rats

In general, the behavioral tests (OFT, SPT, FST, and TST) results confirmed the successful establishment of depression-like behavior models. After CUMS, the animals exhibited a significant decrease in sucrose preference (mice and rats: p < 0.05), decreased distance ventured into the central area (mice and rats: p < 0.01), and notably elevated immobility duration in the TST (mice: p < 0.05) and FST (mice: p < 0.01; rats: p < 0.05) compared to the animals in NC group (Fig. 2). Meanwhile there was significant reduction in weight gain at the end of model establishment in CUMS group compared to the animals NC group (mice and rats: p < 0.01) (Fig. 3).

After 28 days of FLX treatment, the depression-like behaviors (OFT, SPT, and FST) were remarkably improved in CUMS + FLX group compared to CUMS group both in mice and in rats’ models (Fig. 2). However, there was no significant increase in immobility time (TST test) in mice model.

Effect of Chronic Stress on Peripheral and Tissue 5-HT Levels in Mice and Rats

In mice model, there was a significant increase in serum 5-HT levels and a significant reduction in plasma 5-HT levels in CUMS-model group (p < 0.05) compared with the NC group, while platelet 5-HT levels had not much change (Fig. 4A-4C). In rats’ model, there was a significant increase in serum 5-HT levels while plasma and platelet 5-HT levels showed little change in the CUMS group compared with the NC group (Fig. 4J-4L).

In mice model, there was a significant decrease of 5-HT levels in cerebral cortex (p < 0.05; Fig. 4G) and a significant decrease of 5-HT levels in hippocampus (p < 0.01; Fig. 4H) in CUMS group compared to NC group, whereas there was a decreased tendency of 5-HT levels in colon (Fig. 4I), although this decrease was not significant. In rats’ model, there was a decreased tendency of 5-HT levels in cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and colon in CUMS group compared to NC group (Fig. 4P-4R). although there were no significant changes.

Effect of FLX on Peripheral and Tissue 5-HT Levels in Mice and Rats

After 28 days of FLX treatment, peripheral and tissue 5-HT levels were showed in Figure 4. In mice model, serum 5-HT levels and platelet 5-HT levels were significantly decreased in CUMS + FLX group (p < 0.01; Fig. 4D, 4F), meanwhile plasma 5-HT levels had not much change compared with CUMS group (Fig. 4E). There was an increasing tendency of 5-HT levels in colon, cerebral cortex, and hippocampus in CUMS + FLX group compared with CUMS group (Fig. 4G-4I). In rats’ model, serum, plasma and platelet 5-HT levels significantly decreased in CUMS + FLX group compared with the CUMS group (p < 0.01; Fig. 4M-4O). There was little change of the tissues 5-HT level in CUMS + FLX group, compared with CUMS group (Fig. 4P-4R).

Effect of Chronic Stress on TPH, 5-HT1A Receptor and SERT Expression in Tissue and FXL Treatment in Mice Model

As observed in Figure 5A, TPH2 and 5-HT1A receptor expression in cerebral cortex were decreased significantly in CUMS model compared to the NC group (p < 0.05). But not much change in TPH2, 5-HT1A receptor and SERT expression in hippocampus were observed in CUMS group compared to the NC group (Fig. 5B). TPH1 expression in colon was significantly decreased in CUMS group compared to NC group (p < 0.01), while 5-HT1A receptor expression had not much changed (Fig. 5C). As for platelets, there was a significant increase of SERT expression (p < 0.01) in CUMS group compared to NC group, 5-HT1A receptor expression had not much changed (Fig. 5D).

After FLX treatment of fluoxetine, TPH2 and 5-HT1A receptor expression in the cerebral cortex were enhanced in CUMS + FLX group compared to CUMS group (p < 0.05; Fig. 5A). SERT expression in the hippocampus was decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in CUMS + FLX group compared with CUMS group, while TPH2 expression level had not much changed, and 5-HT1A receptor expression increased significantly (p < 0.05; Fig. 5B). In the colon, there was a significant increase in the TPH1 expression in CUMS + FLX group than CUMS group (p < 0.05), meanwhile 5-HT1A expression had not much changed (Fig. 5C). In the platelets, FLX inhibited the elevated SERT expression significantly in CUMS + FLX group compared with CUMS group (p < 0.01) but didn’t change the 5-HT1A receptor expression (Fig. 5D).

Effect of Chronic Stress on TPH, 5-HT1A Receptor and SERT Expression in Tissue and FXL Treatment in Rats Model

As observed in Figure 5, similar to the result in mice model above, 5-HT1A receptor expression in cerebral cortex was decreased in CUMS group compared with NC group, but not much change in TPH2 expression. SERT expression in cerebral cortex was increased in CUMS group compared with NC group (Fig. 5E). In rat’s hippocampus, TPH2 and 5-HT1A displayed a decreased expression while SERT expression displayed an increased expression in CUMS group compared with NC group (Fig. 5F). In rat’s colon, there was a significant reduction in TPH1 expression (p < 0.01) with a substantial increase in SERT expression (p < 0.05) in CUMS group (Fig. 5G). In rat’s platelets, SERT expression exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.01; Fig. 5H) in CUMS group compared with NC group.

After FLX treatment of fluoxetine, SERT expression in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus were slightly inhibited in CUMS + FLX group compared with CUMS group (Fig. 5E, 5F), though the changes were not significant. In the colon (Fig. 5G), TPH1 expression was increased significantly (p < 0.01) while SERT expression was decreased slightly, and 5-HT1A receptor expression increased slightly in the CUMS + FLX group compared with the CUMS group. Lastly, compared with CUMS group, SERT expression in platelets showed a significant decrease (p < 0.01) and 5-HT1A receptor expression in platelets showed an increasing trend in the CUMS + FLX group (Fig. 5H).

DISCUSSION

The unpredictable chronic mild stress model of depression was first proposed by Katz in 1982 and further developed by Papp and Willner [25]. Considered by many to be the animal model of depression with the greatest validity and translational potential, CUMS model maximises the simulation of patients suffering from chronic psychological stress in the clinic and is widely used to simulate depression-related behaviors in humans. Com-pared with some other stress models such as the chronic restraint stress, social defeat stress and early life stress, CUMS overcomes the stress habituation. In this model, rats or mice are chronically exposed to a sustained bombardment of unpredictable micro-stressors, leading to the development of a large number of behavioural changes, including a decreased response to rewards, a behaviour that is associated with the clinical core symptom of depression, anhedonia. However, the drawback of the model is that it is difficult to perform CUMS experiments, which requires a lot of work, space and time [26]. In this paper, the use of two animal breeds with highly stable genetic backgrounds, C57BL/6 mice and SD rats, excludes the influence of genetic factors of depression and ensures the consistency of experimental data. Epidemiological statistics show that the global prevalence of 12-month major depression is 5.8% in woman and 3.5% in man [27]. The gender difference in depression was generally believed that twice as many women suffer from major depression than men, whereas there was no significant difference in serum serotonin levels by sex [28]. In addition, most of the current research focuses on male animals and ignores a role in the female gender, with many potential compounds being discarded in drug development [29]. Therefore, this study was conducted on female animals.

In this study, we successfully established a chronic stress-induced depressive-like behavior animal model in mice and rats. And we simultaneously measured 5-HT levels in serum, plasma, and platelets for the first time. In general, the results showed that chronic stress significantly increased serum 5-HT levels, decreased plasma 5-HT levels, but did not change much platelet 5-HT levels in mice model. FLX treatment significantly decreased serum and platelet 5-HT levels but did not change much plasma 5-HT levels. Like those results in mice model, chronic stress significantly increased serum 5-HT levels, but did not change much plasma 5-HT and platelet 5-HT levels in rats’ model. FLX treatment significantly decreased serum, plasma, and platelet 5-HT levels.

Since 5-HT cannot pass through the blood-brain barrier, peripheral and central 5-HT systems function independently. However, the correlation between peripheral 5-HT levels and central 5-HT levels has always been research interest [30]. Many studies focused on serum 5-HT levels or platelet 5-HT levels or plasma 5-HT levels, the results were disparate results [17,18,31]. In this work, there was no evidence to suggest a consistent correlation between 5-HT levels in brain tissue and peripheral blood. However, unlike the diverse variations in various peripheral blood 5-HT levels, chronic stress led to a reduction in hippocampal and cortical 5-HT levels in mice and rats, while fluoxetine might reverse this decrease in this work.

5-HT, also known as serotonin, is synthesized from tryptophan by TPH to 5-hydroxytryptophan, which is then synthesized by 5-hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase in central nervous system (CNS) neurons and intestinal chromaffin cells in the digestive tract of animals [32]. TPH is divided into two isoforms, TPH1 (which is responsible for the majority of the peripheral 5-HT) and TPH2 (which is responsible for the pool of the central neurotransmitters in the CNS) [33]. 5-HT is usually stored in presynaptic vesicles and released into the synaptic gap as required for neurotransmission. Serotonergic signaling is terminated primarily by the uptake of 5-HT from the synaptic gap back into the presynaptic neuron, which is achieved primarily through SERT on the presynaptic membrane. The initial FLX intake usually inhibits SERT, leading to elevated extracellular 5-HT levels within synaptic clefts. However, prolonged use of FLX causes an excess of extracellular 5-HT, triggering activation of presynaptic 5-HT1A auto-receptors. This activation subsequently reduces 5-HT synthesis, and lowers intracellular 5-HT levels [34]. The reduced uptake by SERT leads to decreased intraneuronal 5-HT levels. After 2 weeks of FXL treatment, desensitization of 5-HT auto-receptors occurs, and serotonin synthesis is restored [35,36]. In this work, plasma 5-HT levels did not change significantly after FLX treatment in mice model but showed decrease after FLX treatment in rats’ model. The variation might stem from species-specific differences and different rates of drug response. In this work, rats were exposed with a longer modeling process compared to mice (15 weeks vs. 4 weeks), suggesting that rats exhibited a slightly delayed response to chronic stress. In addition, it is difficult to ascertain that PPP is truly devoid of platelets and extra-platelet 5-HT might be bound to albumin or other serotonin-binding proteins [37], which would pose an unknown impact on determination of physiological-active 5-HT outside of platelets. And during the preparation of PRP or PPP, centrifugation process might have an uncertain effect on the release of 5-HT, which would further influence to the 5-HT concentration of plasma components.

Among the peripheral biomarkers of depression diagnosis of interest in this study, mice and rat models of chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviors showed a same result of significantly increased serum 5-HT levels. This result was consistent with some studies. For example, the serum 5-HT concentrations in a cohort of depressed patients were notably higher than those in a healthy control group before drug treatment [31]. Serum 5-HT levels usually consist of the bioactive 5-HT in plasma and 5-HT released during platelet aggregation and coagulation. And according to our experimental results, it was found that the vast majority of serum 5-HT originated from platelets 5-HT. Platelet 5-HT levels largely depend on the functioning of uptake-related mediators, especially SERT and 5-HT1A receptors. Plasma 5-HT has a rapid turnover rate and its concentration results from the balance between synthesis and release by enterochromaffin cells and deamination by monoamine oxidase (MAO) in the liver and renal [38]. Due to rapid metabolization and degradation through MAO, free serotonin plasma concentrations are negligible [39]. Plasma MAO activity levels may be indicative of the rate of 5-HT catabolism. However, MAO activity was not measured in this study, which is a limitation of our work. Patients with complex neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders have already been described with altered platelet function several decades ago [40-42]. Recent studies also found platelet abnormalities in patients with psychiatric-related disorders [43,44]. Some studies reported increased platelet activation in individuals with depression, compared to healthy controls [45], and platelet release of 5-HT relies on its activation. We speculated that CUMS led to increased platelet activation in mice and rats, with an increased amount of 5-HT released from platelets in the serum, and therefore increased serum 5-HT concentrations. The platelet 5-HT levels in CUMS group did not show a significant increase both in mice and rats’ model seemed to be in line with the findings of several studies. For example, one study found no significant difference in platelet 5-HT levels between depressed patients and controls [46], and researchers in the other study observed that platelet 5-HT levels in untreated depressed patients were similar to those of healthy controls, and platelet 5-HT net uptake rate was found to be significantly increased in severely depressed patients compared to the healthy group [47], which was consistent with our western blotting results of a significant increase in SERT protein expression in the CUMS group of mice and rats compared to the NC group.

In the present study of peripheral biomarkers of response to antidepressant drug treatment, our findings indicated that 5-HT levels in peripheral platelets and serum were significantly reduced in both model mice and model rats treated with FLX. Similar to our results, it has been suggested in the study that peripheral serotonin decreased after FLX treatment [48]. One study also reported that citalopram-treated CUMS rats demonstrated a significant reduction in platelet 5-HT levels [49], and another study found a significant decrease in serum 5-HT after two weeks of fluoxetine treatment in depressed patients [50]. FLX blocks 5-HT transporters in the presynaptic membrane and maintains 5-HT in the synaptic gap. Platelets contain the same 5-HT transporter as neurons, suggesting that FLX blocks the transporter in the platelet membrane and prevents 5-HT from entering the platelet. In our study, the increase in SERT expression levels in platelets of model mice and model rats was reversed by FLX treatment, which may have resulted in a significant decrease in platelet 5-HT levels after a substantial reduction in platelet reuptake. In addition, FLX treatment may have reduced up-regulated platelet activity, resulting in a decrease in the amount of 5-HT released by platelets in the serum, and therefore a decrease in serum 5-HT.

About 50% of patients exhibit a positive response to SSRIs among the most prevalent antidepressant treatments. There is still work to be done to develop depression medications for the remaining patients who fail to remit effectively [28]. Consequently, more efforts should be done to develop potential biomarkers to respond antidepressants efficacy [51,52]. Based on the depression pathogenesis and drug development efficacy, 5-HT might potentially serve as biomarker for depression diagnosis and response to antidepressants. Clinical practice advocates for the development of single or combined biomarkers to ensure precise diagnosis and prognosis prediction for depression [53,54]. Our preliminary work might conclude that although these peripheral indexes are not direct reflectors of central 5-HT levels, increased serum 5-HT levels might be feasible to serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis of depression, meanwhile decreased serum 5-HT and platelet 5-HT levels might respond to antidepressant treatment.

There are some limitations for this work due to the small sample size. Nevertheless, our results suggested the reliability of increased serum 5-HT level as biomarker for the diagnosis, and the reduced serum and platelet 5-HT levels as biomarkers for efficacy evaluation of antidepressants in depression. In addition, a clinically viable method of analyzing 5-HT, characterized by ease of handling, high sensitivity and specificity, as well as good reproducibility, may pave the way for its inclusion in a comprehensive diagnostic portfolio for clinical utilization.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Feng Xu. Data acquisition: Zuanjun Su, Zhicong Chen, Canye Li, Jinming Cao, Jingjing Duan, Ting Zhou, Zhen Yang, Yuanchi Cheng, Zhijun Xiao. Formal analysis: Zuanjun Su, Zhicong Chen. Writing−original draft: Zuanjun Su. Writing−review & editing, Funding acquisition: Feng Xu. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding
This work was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science Commission (grant number 19411971700).
Figures
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of experimental procedure.
NC, normal control; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; w, week; FLX, fluoxetine.
Fig. 2. Chronic stress models were established successfully and fluoxetine intervention improved depression-like behavior stress–induced in mice and rats. (A) Sucrose preference in SPT of mice at the end of CUMS. (B) Central area distance in OFT of mice at the end of CUMS. (C) Immobility time in TST of mice at the end of CUMS. (D) Immobility time in FST of mice at the end of CUMS (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (E) Sucrose preference in SPT of mice at the end of treatment. (F) Central area distance in OFT of mice at the end of treatment. (G) Immobility time in TST of mice at the end of treatment. (H) Immobility time in FST of mice at the end of treatment (n = 10/group). (I) Sucrose preference in SPT of rats at the end of CUMS. (J) Central area distance in OFT of rats at the end of CUMS. (K) Immobility time in FST of rats at the end of CUMS (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (L) Sucrose preference in SPT of rats at the end of treatment. (M) Central area distance in OFT of rats at the end of treatment. (N) Immobility time in FST of rats at the end of treatment (n = 10/group). Data were shown as the mean ± standard error of mean. The statistical analyses involved the two independent samples t test for comparisons between two groups and one-way analyses of variance alongside the Tukey test for comparisons across multiple groups.
NC, normal control; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; FLX, fluoxetine; SPT, sucrose preference test; OFT, open field test; TST, tail suspension test; FST, forced swimming test.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 3. Gavaged with fluoxetine reversed the weight loss caused by CUMS. (A) Body weight in the process of CUMS of mice. (B) Body weight gain at the end of CUMS of mice (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (C) Body weight in the process of treatment of mice. (D) Body weight gain at the end of treatment of mice (n = 10/group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, CUMS group vs. NC group; ##p < 0.01, CUMS + FLX group vs. NC group). (E) Body weight in the process of CUMS of rats. (F) Body weight gain at the end of CUMS of rats (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (G) Body weight in the process of treatment of rats. (H) Body weight gain at the end of treatment of rats (n = 10/group, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, CUMS group vs. NC group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, CUMS + FLX group vs. NC group). The statistical analyses in-volved the two independent samples t test for comparisons between two groups and one-way analyses of variance alongside the Tukey test for comparisons across multiple groups.
NC, normal control; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; FLX, fluoxetine.
Fig. 4. Peripheral blood and tissue 5-HT of mice and rats. (A) Serum 5-HT of mice at the end of CUMS. (B) Plasma 5-HT of mice at the end of CUMS. (C) Platelet 5-HT of mice at the end of CUMS (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (D) Serum 5-HT of mice after treatment. (E) Plasma 5-HT of mice after treatment. (F) Platelet 5-HT of mice after treatment (n = 10/group). (G) Cerebral cortex 5-HT of mice. (H) Hippocampus 5-HT of mice. (I) Colon 5-HT of mice. (J) Serum 5-HT of rats at the end of CUMS. (K) Plasma 5-HT of rats at the end of CUMS. (L) Platelet 5-HT of rats at the end of CUMS (n = 10 in NC group, n = 20 in CUMS group). (M) Serum 5-HT of rats after treatment. (N) Plasma 5-HT of rats after treatment. (O) Platelet 5-HT of rats after treatment (n = 10/group). (P) Cerebral cortex 5-HT of rats. (Q) Hippocampus 5-HT of rats. (R) Colon 5-HT of rats. Data were shown as the mean ± standard error of mean. Statistical com-parisons between the two groups were performed using the two independent samples t test. Com-parisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way analyses of variance and Tukey test.
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; NC, nor-mal control; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; FLX, fluoxetine.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5. Tissue and platelet 5-HT-related protein expression in mice and rats (n = 3/group). (A) TPH2 and 5-HT1A expression in the cerebral cortex of mice. (B) SERT, TPH2, and 5-HT1A expression in the hippocampus of mice. (C) TPH1 and 5-HT1A expression in the colon of mice. (D) platelet SERT and 5-HT1A expression of mice. (E) SERT, TPH2, and 5-HT1A expression in the cerebral cortex of rats. (F) SERT, TPH2, and 5-HT1A expression in the hippocampus of rats. (G) SERT, TPH1, and 5-HT1A expression in the colon of rats. (H) SERT and 5-HT1A expression in the platelets of rats. Data were shown as the mean ± standard error of mean. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using the two independent samples t test. Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way analyses of variance and Tukey test.
NC, normal control; CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; FLX, fluoxetine; TPH, tryptophan hydroxylase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; SERT, 5-HT transporter.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Tables

Methods and duration of chronic unpredictable mild stress intervention

Stressors Duration
Ice water swimming(4°C) 5 min
Hot water swimming(45°C) 5 min
Cage vibration 20 min
Restraint stress 3 hr
Damp bedding 12 hr
Noise interference (85 dB) 1.5 hr
Cycle disturbances 24 hr
Cage tilting (45°) 12 hr
No sawdust 12 hr
References
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Depressive disorder (depression) [Internet]. WHO; 2023 Mar 31 [cited at 2024 Jan 1]. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression.
  2. Harsanyi S, Kupcova I, Danisovic L, Klein M. Selected biomarkers of depression: what are the effects of cytokines and inflammation? Int J Mol Sci 2022;24:578.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Jesulola E, Micalos P, Baguley IJ. Understanding the pathophysiology of depression: from monoamines to the neurogenesis hypothesis model - are we there yet? Behav Brain Res 2018;341:79-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Tsai TY, Tseng HH, Chi MH, Chang HH, Wu CK, Yang YK, et al. The interaction of oxytocin and social support, loneliness, and cortisol level in major depression. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2019;17:487-494.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Eun TK, Jeong SH, Lee KY, Kim SH, Ahn YM, Bang YW, et al. Association between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and childhood characteristics in mood disorders. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2016;14:88-95.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Coppen A. The biochemistry of affective disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1967;113:1237-1264.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Albert PR, Benkelfat C, Descarries L. The neurobiology of depression--revisiting the serotonin hypothesis. I. Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012;367:2378-2381.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Hahn A, Haeusler D, Kraus C, Höflich AS, Kranz GS, Baldinger P, et al. Attenuated serotonin transporter association between dorsal raphe and ventral striatum in major depression. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:3857-3866.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Yohn CN, Gergues MM, Samuels BA. The role of 5-HT receptors in depression. Mol Brain 2017;10:28.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Meyer JH. Imaging the serotonin transporter during major depressive disorder and antidepressant treatment. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2007;32:86-102.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  11. Smith K. Mental health: a world of depression. Nature 2014;515:181.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Malik S, Singh R, Arora G, Dangol A, Goyal S. Biomarkers of major depressive disorder: knowing is half the battle. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2021;19:12-25.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Ogawa S, Tsuchimine S, Kunugi H. Cerebrospinal fluid monoamine metabolite concentrations in depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of historic evidence. J Psychiatr Res 2018;105:137-146.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Sarrias MJ, Artigas F, Martínez E, Gelpí E, Alvarez E, Udina C, et al. Decreased plasma serotonin in melancholic patients: a study with clomipramine. Biol Psychiatry 1987;22:1429-1438.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Choi W, Kim JW, Kang HJ, Kim HK, Kang HC, Lee JY, et al. Interaction effect of serum serotonin level and age on the 12-week pharmacotherapeutic response in patients with depressive disorders. Sci Rep 2021;11:24226.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Mück-Seler D, Pivac N, Sagud M, Jakovljević M, Mihaljević-Peles A. The effects of paroxetine and tianeptine on peripheral biochemical markers in major depression. Prog Neuropsy-chopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2002;26:1235-1243.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Liu MY, Ren YP, Zhang LJ, Ding JY. Pretreatment with ginseng fruit saponins affects serotonin expression in an experimental comorbidity model of myocardial infarction and depression. Aging Dis 2016;7:680-686.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Kudryashov NV, Kalinina TS, Shimshirt AA, Volkova AV, Narkevich VB, Naplekova PL, et al. The behavioral and neurochemical aspects of the interaction between antidepressants and unpredictable chronic mild stress. Acta Naturae 2020;12:63-72.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Li C, Cai Q, Su Z, Chen Z, Cao J, Xu F. Could peripheral 5-HT level be used as a biomarker for depression diagnosis and treatment? A narrative minireview. Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1149511. Erratum in: Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1318433.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Yang Z, Li Z, Guo Z, Ren Y, Zhou T, Xiao Z, et al. Antitumor effect of fluoxetine on chronic stress-promoted lung cancer growth via suppressing kynurenine pathway and enhancing cellular immunity. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:685898.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Li G, Yang J, Wang X, Zhou C, Zheng X, Lin W. Effects of EGCG on depression-related behavior and serotonin concentration in a rat model of chronic unpredictable mild stress. Food Funct 2020;11:8780-8787.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Moncrieff J, Cooper RE, Stockmann T, Amendola S, Hengartner MP, Horowitz MA. The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence. Mol Psychiatry 2023;28:3243-3256.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Nollet M. Models of depression: unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice. Curr Protoc 2021;1:e208.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Wang LS, Zhang MD, Tao X, Zhou YF, Liu XM, Pan RL, et al. LC-MS/MS-based quantification of tryptophan metabolites and neurotransmitters in the serum and brain of mice. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2019;1112:24-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Willner P. The chronic mild stress (CMS) model of depression: history, evaluation and usage. Neurobiol Stress 2016;6:78-93.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Antoniuk S, Bijata M, Ponimaskin E, Wlodarczyk J. Chronic unpredictable mild stress for modeling depression in rodents: meta-analysis of model reliability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019;99:101-116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Ferrari AJ, Somerville AJ, Baxter AJ, Norman R, Patten SB, Vos T, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Psychol Med 2013;43:471-481.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Lindström M, Tohmola N, Renkonen R, Hämäläinen E, Schalin-Jäntti C, Itkonen O. Comparison of serum serotonin and serum 5-HIAA LC-MS/MS assays in the diagnosis of serotonin producing neuroendocrine neoplasms: a pilot study. Clin Chim Acta 2018;482:78-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Sorge RE, Mapplebeck JC, Rosen S, Beggs S, Taves S, Alexander JK, et al. Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice. Nat Neurosci 2015;18:1081-1083.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Audhya T, Adams JB, Johansen L. Correlation of serotonin levels in CSF, platelets, plasma, and urine. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1820:1496-1501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Fajardo O, Galeno J, Urbina M, Carreira I, Lima L. Serotonin, serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and dopamine in blood peripheral lymphocytes of major depression patients. Int Immunophar-macol 2003;3:1345-1352.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Matthes S, Bader M. Peripheral serotonin synthesis as a new drug target. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018;39:560-572.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Scotton WJ, Hill LJ, Williams AC, Barnes NM. Serotonin syndrome: pathophysiology, clinical features, management, and potential future directions. Int J Tryptophan Res 2019;12:1178646919873925.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Fakhoury M. New insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of major depressive disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2015;37:172-177.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Bianchi M, Moser C, Lazzarini C, Vecchiato E, Crespi F. Forced swimming test and fluoxetine treatment: in vivo evidence that peripheral 5-HT in rat platelet-rich plasma mirrors cerebral extracellular 5-HT levels, whilst 5-HT in isolated platelets mirrors neuronal 5-HT changes. Exp Brain Res 2002;143:191-197.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Fakhoury M. Revisiting the serotonin hypothesis: implications for major depressive disorders. Mol Neurobiol 2016;53:2778-2786.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Anderson GM, Feibel FC, Cohen DJ. Determination of serotonin in whole blood, platelet-rich plasma, platelet-poor plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate. Life Sci 1987;40:1063-1070.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Birkenhäger TK, van den Broek WW, Fekkes D, Mulder PG, Moleman P, Bruijn JA. Lithium addition in antidepressant-resistant depression: effects on platelet 5-HT, plasma 5-HT and plasma 5-HIAA concentration. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007;31:1084-1088.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Brand T, Anderson GM. The measurement of platelet-poor plasma serotonin: a systematic review of prior reports and recommendations for improved analysis. Clin Chem 2011;57:1376-1386.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Todrick A, Tait AC, Marshall EF. Blood platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine levels in psychiatric patients. J Ment Sci 1960;106:884-890.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Boullin DJ, Coleman M, O'Brien RA. Abnormalities in platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine efflux in patients with infantile autism. Nature 1970;226:371-372.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Boullin DJ, O'Brien RA. Accumulation of dopamine by blood platelets from normal subjects and parkinsonian patients under treatment with L-DOPA. Br J Pharmacol 1970;39:779-788.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Karatoprak S, Uzun N, Akıncı MA, Dönmez YE. Neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios among adolescents with substance use disorder: a preliminary study. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2021;19:669-676.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Cıcek E, Demırel B, Cıcek IE, Kıraç AS, Eren I. Increased neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios in male heroin addicts: a prospective controlled study. Clin Psycho-pharmacol Neurosci 2018;16:190-196.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Musselman DL, Tomer A, Manatunga AK, Knight BT, Porter MR, Kasey S, et al. Exaggerated platelet reactivity in major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153:1313-1317.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Lima L, Mata S, Urbina M. Allelic isoforms and decrease in serotonin transporter mRNA in lymphocytes of patients with major depression. Neuroimmunomodulation 2005;12:299-306.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Franke L, Schewe HJ, Müller B, Campman V, Kitzrow W, Uebelhack R, et al. Serotonergic platelet variables in unmedicated patients suffering from major depression and healthy subjects: relationship between 5HT content and 5HT uptake. Life Sci 2000;67:301-315.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Schneider MA, Heeb L, Beffinger MM, Pantelyushin S, Linecker M, Roth L, et al. Attenuation of peripheral serotonin inhibits tumor growth and enhances immune checkpoint blockade therapy in murine tumor models. Sci Transl Med 2021;13:eabc8188.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Li X, Fan Y, Xiao S, Peng S, Dong X, Zheng X, et al. Decreased platelet 5-hydroxytryptamin (5-HT) levels: a response to antidepressants. J Affect Disord 2015;187:84-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Alvarez JC, Gluck N, Fallet A, Grégoire A, Chevalier JF, Advenier C, et al. Plasma serotonin level after 1 day of fluoxetine treatment: a biological predictor for antidepressant response? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;143:97-101.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual frame-work. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001;69:89-95.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Cagney DN, Sul J, Huang RY, Ligon KL, Wen PY, Alexander BM. The FDA NIH Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) resource in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2018;20:1162-1172.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Gafarov VV, Gromova HA, Gagulin IV, Ekimova YC, Santrapinskiy DK. Arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke: risk of development and psychosocial factors. Alaska Med 2007;49(2 Suppl):117-119.
    Pubmed
  54. Gabriele S, Sacco R, Persico AM. Blood serotonin levels in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;24:919-929.
    Pubmed CrossRef


This Article

Close ✕


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)
  • Scopus (0)
  • Download (248)

Author ORCID Information

Funding Information
  • Shanghai Municipal Science Commission
     
      19411971700

Services
Social Network Service

e-submission

Archives