
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is generally diagnosed in childhood, which is also characterized by attention deficit, as well as hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Generally speaking, the academic achievements of individuals with ADHD are negatively affected, their cognitive functions are declined, they have difficulty in controlling their behavior, and in addition to experiencing emotional and behavioral problems, their social functionality is also affected [1].
ADHD is considered as one of the most frequently seen mental health disorders and affects 7.2% of children and adolescents, and 4% of the adult population all over the world [2]. Individuals diagnosed with ADHD in childhood also carry these diagnostic criteria into their adulthood [3]. Even if the symptoms disappear with aging, 50−70% of children diagnosed with ADHD, retain diagnostic criteria of ADHD in their adulthood [4].
Studies have shown that ADHD may be inherited in 70−80% of the cases [5,6]. The use of tobacco products during pregnancy and environmental toxins, preterm birth, low birth weight, inadequate and imbalanced nutrition, and viral infections have been defined as risk factors for the development of ADHD [7
-9].
The etiopathogenesis of ADHD has not been fully elucidated. However, it has been suggested that functional disorders related to the metabolism of neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline and dopamine, which are catecholamine derivatives found in the cerebral cortex, might play a role in its etiopathogenesis [10].
Several studies in the literature have demonstrated that oxidative stress levels significantly increase in ADHD. Recently higher blood levels of malondialdehyde have been reported in patients with ADHD [11], and furthermore, an increase in lipid peroxidation has been detected in patients with ADHD [12]. Additionally, increased xanthine oxidase levels have been noted in patients diagnosed with ADHD [13].
Free oxygen radicals are the natural by-products of metabolism. Under normal conditions, a balance exists between the production, and elimination rates of free oxygen radicals known as the oxidant/antioxidant balance [14]. Cell membrane damage, DNA damage, programmed cell death, and protein carboxylation are the types of irreversible damage induced by an excessive amount of free oxygen radicals [15]. Many organs and tissues are affected by free oxygen radicals, but brain tissue due to its dense lipid content, low antioxidant levels, and high oxygen consumption, is more susceptible to the harmful effects of these free radicals [16]. Of course, the body has some antioxidative defense mechanisms available to overcome these detrimental effects of free radicals. Thiols are one of the most important enzymes of antioxidant defense mechanisms [17].
Recently, studies have depicted that the thiol/disulfide homeostasis is disrupted in schizophrenia, autistic spectrum disorders, neurological disorders including migraine, epilepsy, and internal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, which may be involved in the pathogenesis of many disorders [18-20].
Disulfide bonds are formed via oxidation of thiols. As the first observable change in protein oxidation, free oxygen radicals attack the thiol groups of sulfur-containing amino acids leading to oxidation [21].
The thiol group of the cysteine amino acid is highly susceptible to oxidative attack, and the thiol radical formed via different mechanisms from thiol groups induce formation of disulfide bonds in proteins [21]. The thiol/disulfide balance is vital for body detoxification, intracellular signal transduction, antioxidative defense, regulation of enzyme activity, as well as programmed cell death [17,22].
Free oxygen radicals damage both intracellular and extracellular structures and disrupt genetic codes by inducing permanent changes in DNA [23]. As a marker of the oxidative stress, 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) suggestively impairs mitochondria through its oxidizing activity [24]. Normally, after oxidation, a number of cellular mechanisms repair the damaged DNA; and thus 8-OHdG, which is an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative damage, is removed from the body. Ultimately, endogenous 8-OHdG may be detected in both the blood and urine, which can indicate the presence of damage to DNA. Hence, due to these findings, endogenous 8-OHdG is considered as a biomarker for DNA damage in various diseases [25]. An increase in the level of 8-OHdG and resultant DNA damage have been detected in patients with ADHD compared to healthy volunteers [26]. However, when oxidative stress levels of newly diagnosed ADHD patients were compared, the similar levels of oxidative stress have been reported in both groups [27].
Levels of oxidative status in ADHD patients have been measured with various biomarkers. However, in our study, for the first time, thiol/disulfide homeostasis has been investigated and the levels of oxidative DNA damage in adult ADHD patients have been compared to the healthy group. As a relatively new marker of oxidative stress, thiol/disulfide homeostasis is disrupted in neuropsychiatric diseases. For the purposes of this study, we reviewed the relevant past literature, and for the first time in the literature, we have aimed to evaluate the thiol/disulfide balance as a marker of oxidative stress, and to compare the levels 8-OHdG, similar to many other diseases, ADHD negatively affects the oxidative processes in the organism
This study was conducted at Psychiatry department of Medical Faculty at Van Yuzuncu Yil Universty between January 2020 and September 2020. The institutional ethical review board approved the study with reference number of 08 at 18.12.2019. The study participant were informed about the study and consent was obtained from all subjects.
Forty-nine patients, who were diagnosed with adult ADHD as per the defined Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition criteria by an experienced psychiatrist at Van Yuzuncu Yil University Psychiatry Clinic, were included in the work. The healthy group was comprised of 33 volunteers.
Patients with metabolic, endocrine, and neurological disorders, diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, obesity, other psychiatric pathologies, mental retardation, psychosis, schizophrenia, mood disorders smokers, alcohol and substance addicts, cases with a history of antioxidant agent use, and those patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy were excluded from the current study.
Both groups were matched in condition of age, gender, smoking status, and other sociodemographic characteristics. Biochemical tests and inflammatory markers were investigated in all participants. All participants signed their informed consent forms.
Briefly, 10 ml of serum sample or standard, and 10 ml of reagent one were mingled in a test tube. Following an incubation period of 100 seconds at room temperature, 110 ml of reagent two was added to the mix, while subsequently it was incubated for 200 seconds at room temperature. The initial absorbance was detected at a wavelength of 415 nm. Then, 10 ml of reagent three was added to the mix and then it was incubated for 300 seconds at room temperature. The final absorbance was detected at 415 nm. Total thiol levels were calculated based on the standard curve.
Ten ml of serum sample or standard and 100 ml of reagent one were mixed in a test tube and incubated for 300 seconds at room temperature. Following the incubation period, the first absorbance was detected at a wavelength of 415 nm. Then, 10 ml of reagent two was added to the mix and subsequently incubated for another 300 seconds at room temperature. Following the incubation, the final absorbance was determined at 415 nm Native thiol levels were calculated based on the standard curve. Disulfide levels were calculated by subtracting the native thiol values from the total thiol values and dividing them by two. Disulfide/total thiol, disulfide/native thiol and native thiol/total thiol ratios were calculated and the results were given as percentages [28].
For the purposes of detecting the oxidative DNA damage, DNA was isolated from leukocytes and then 8-OHdG, as well as dG levels were measured. Initially, DNA was isolated from whole blood samples taken from patients and healthy subjects by using commercial DNA isolation kits (Nucleo Spin Blood DNA, RNA and Protein Preparation; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Isolated DNA samples were hydrolyzed with formic acid, as previously described by Kaur and Halliwell [29,30]. The concentrations of 8-OHdG and dG of the hydrolyzed DNA samples were determined using the previously described high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with electrochemical detector (ECD) and variable wavelength detector [29]. Prior to analysis by HPLC, hydrolyzed DNA samples were dissolved in HPLC eluent in a final volume of 1 ml. A total of 20 ml of final lysate was analyzed by HPLC-ECD. A reverse phase-C18 analytical column (250 mm, 4.6 mm, 4.0 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used. The mobile phase contained 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 5.5 and acetonitrile (97:3, v/v) and the flow rate was 1 ml/min. The dG concentration was monitored based on absorption at 245 nm, and the 8-OHdG level was determined based on the ECD reading (600 mV). The dG and 8-OHdG levels were measured using dG and 8-OHdG standards (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); The 8-OHdG level was described as 8-OHdG/ 106dG.
The results and the data from the study were assessed by utilizing the IBM SPSS 20 package program (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Shapiro−Wilks test was used to confirm the normality of distribution. Independent sample ttest and c2 tests were utilized in order to compare the differences between both groups. Results were provided as mean ± standard deviation. pvalue of significance was determined as p < 0.05.
Forty-nine adult patients with ADHD (mean age 26.4 ± 4.11 years) and 33 healthy group (mean age 27.6 ± 5.21 years) were included in this study. Both groups were matched in terms of age, gender status. Smokers, patients with a present or past history of alcohol and substance abuse were not included in the study. Height, weight, and body mass index of participants in both groups were mea-sured, and the groups were matched according to these parameters.
The total thiol and native thiol levels were lower in adult ADHD patients compared to the healthy volunteers (p = 0.001). In addition, the disulfide levels were higher in adult ADHD patients (p = 0.001). Similarly, disulfide/total thiol and disulfide/native thiol levels were significantly higher in adult ADHD patients than those in the control group (p = 0.001). On the other hand, the native/total thiol ratio was significantly higher in the control group (p = 0.001). The levels of 8-OHdG/106dG, a marker of oxidative DNA damage, were significantly higher in adult ADHD patients (p = 0.001). The results are presented in detail in Table 1 and Figure 1.
In our study, we examined the relationship of total thiol and native thiol levels in adult ADHD patients and it was determined that the total thiol and native thiol levels in adult ADHD patients were lower as compared to the control group. Furthermore, disulfide and disulfide/total thiol ratios were found to be higher in the control group. According to these results, it can be stated that the thiol/disulfide homeostasis has changed in favor of disulfide in adult ADHD patients. These results provide information about the oxidative status of adult ADHD patients. In other words, either the number of oxidative reactions has increased, or antioxidant components have decreased in adult patients with ADHD.
In a study reported a decline in total antioxidant status (TAS) levels in children with ADHD [31,32]. In another study demonstrated decreased glutathione peroxidase anti-oxidized enzyme activity, but increased catalase (CAT) enzyme activity in children with ADHD [11]. El Adham et al. [33] reported that serum levels of superoxide dismutase, glutathione-S-transferase, and CAT decreased in patients with ADHD. Ruchi et al. [34], stated that the activity of CAT enzyme decreased in saliva samples of ADHD patients. Oztop et al. [27] reported a lack of any difference between the patients with ADHD and healthy control subjects in terms of paraoxonase 1 and thiol antioxidant levels.
In a study reported increased plasma TAS levels in patients with ADHD [35]. On the contrary, In another study reported that the plasma TAS and thiol levels dropped in the ADHD group [36]. In addition, Nasim et al. [37] detected low serum CAT, glutathione (GSH), and TAS levels in patients with ADHD.
In the light of this information, we can conclude that when the oxidant-antioxidant balance shifts towards the oxidative side, then as a result, the antioxidant defense system weakens, or the number of oxidative reactions increases. Various assumption have been proposed to describe the etiology of oxidative damage in brain tissue. An interaction between the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, sympathoadrenal-medullary systems, and oxidative stress has been proposed [38]. An alternative explanation of the mechanisms underlying oxidative stress is that neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline and dopamine, which are catecholamine derivatives, may induce the activation of the sympathetic system via the HPA axis. These activations trigger the release of corticosterone and hormones in the adrenal medulla [39].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) target primarily the -SH group of the cysteine contained in the structure of pro-teins. As ROS attack these protein structures, -SH is oxidized to disulfide, and then the protein may lose its function. Thiol-containing compounds such as GSH are important components of the organism’s antioxidant defense system. In addition, they are important for apoptosis as well as the stabilization of proteins.
Assessment of the shift in the thiol/disulfide balance can present information concerning the oxidative state. Ates et al. [40] in their study have shown that in diabetic patients, the thiol/disulfide homeostasis is impaired, and Altıparmak et al. [41] have demonstrated that this balance is disrupted in favor of disulfide in patients with coronary artery disease. Erzin et al. [28,42] demonstrated that the lower serum native thiol levels in bipolar patients who were in remission, and higher levels of disulfide in patients with bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. A study by Unal et al. [43] researched the thiol/disulfide homeostasis in patients with schizophrenia and they demonstrated that the disulfide levels were significantly higher, but native and total thiol levels were significantly lower in schizophrenic patients.
The findings of this research have suggested that the thiol/disulfide balance is severely disrupted in adult ADHD patients and larger studies should be conducted to measure the difference between untreated patients, control subjects, as well as those patients that are receiving regular or irregular treatment for ADHD. Adult patients and children with ADHD should be compared in terms of oxidant/antioxidant status and any difference between the adults who were diagnosed with ADHD in childhood or adulthood. Further studies can evaluate this question and our study has the potential to provide important information.
Mechanisms that regulate oxidative stress such as thiol-disulfide homeostasis are associated with various biochemical processes and are not specific to a pathology. Therefore, the result found in patients with adult ADHD is not a specific result; it indicates that the oxidation process created by ADHD in cellular processes is higher than in controls. Rather than being a biomarker to be used in diagnosis, it necessitates the consideration of oxidative processes in treatment management.
This study has also shown that the 8-OHdG levels, which are indicators of oxidative DNA damage, increases in adult ADHD patients. Unlike previous studies, we did not detect 8-OHdG levels in serum, plasma, or urine; but in DNA lesions in order to assess the DNA damage in patients with adult ADHD by using a more sensitive HPLC method. If the base modifications caused by the attack of ROS are not corrected by DNA repair genes, then they induce mutations in DNA. Subsequently, the proteins encoded by these genes become nonfunctional, which may lead to serious complications. A body of evidence has shown that the structure of lipids and proteins in cell membranes and DNA can be irreversibly damaged. DNA in both nuclei and mitochondria are major indicators of 8-OHdG damage, which is constantly triggered by free oxygen radicals [23].
Oztop et al. [27] reported that in the patient group there was a decrease in plasma 8-OHdG levels in the group comprised of the patients as compared to the control group. In the study by Simsek et al. [44], it was shown that 8-OHdG levels were not different between the ADHD patients and the control group. Verlaet et al. [45] found that the urine levels of 8-OHdG had elevated in ADHD patients. Post-mortem examinations have depicted that the increase in the levels of 8-OHdG in cranial tissue samples and bodily fluids are associated with many degenerative diseases and carcinogenesis [46]. The presence of 8-OHdG has been detected as an indicator of oxidative DNA damage in post-mortem studies that have been conducted with deceased patients with the diagnosis of psychiatric illnesses [46]. A tenfold increase in the serum level of 8-OhdG in the hippocampus region has been demonstrated in post-mortem studies of schizophrenics [47]. High levels of serum 8-OHdG have also been reported in patients with major depression [48]. In addition, it has been reported that patients who experienced recurrent depressive episodes have experienced them more severely due to oxidative DNA damage than patients with a history of only a single episode [49].
In our review of literature data, we have seen that different 8-OHdG levels have been reported. These discrepancies among studies may be related to the variations in the types of samples, the sampling methods, patient profiles, and the experimental methods used. In our study, we did not measure the urinary or plasma levels of 8-OHdG, but rather we measured the 8-OHdG levels using a more sensitive HPCL method.
Limitations of the study: Although we tried to homogenize the groups, since each group consisted of a scarce number of patients, and a large spectrum of drugs were used by the patients, we were not able to divide the groups into subgroups. As the OCD group consisted of a small number of patients, it was not possible to classify the patients according to the severity of the disease. In addition, we were unable to eliminate factors that may affect levels of oxidative stress such as family medical histories, diet, sleep patterns, exercise status, and working conditions of the participants. Thus, as suggested above, further studies are recommended in this field that take into account the limitations that we have depicted above. This way, our results can be strengthened, and more data can be obtained for future medical purposes. Especially studies with a higher number of participants are recommended for the future.
We have shown that the thiol/disulfide balance changes toward oxidative side in ADHD patients. Furthermore, as marker of DNA damage, the levels of 8-OHdG were observed to be quite high in ADHD patients. The regulation of oxidative stress balance in adult ADHD patients will be helpful in the treatment of ADHD and also in decreasing morbidity. Based on these results, we can suggest that thiol/disulfide balance is severely impaired in adult ADHD patients and hence larger-scale studies should be conducted to ascertain the difference between untreated patients, as well as those patients who received regular or irregular treatment for ADHD and control groups. In addition, adult ADHD patients who were diagnosed a long time ago and recently should be compared. The adult ADHD patients should be examined in terms of disease duration, treatment status, and the levels of oxidative stress.
The authors would like to thank that work was funding by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Yüzüncü Yil Universty (THD-2020-8890).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Conceptualization: Faruk Kurhan, Hamit Hakan Alp. Data acquisition: Faruk Kurhan, Hamit Hakan Alp. Formal analysis: Faruk Kurhan, Hamit Hakan Alp. Supervision: Faruk Kurhan. Writing−original draft: Faruk kurhan. Writing−review & editing: Faruk Kurhan. All authors interpreted the results and helped to revise the manuscript.
![]() |
![]() |