2023 Impact Factor
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a time tested treatment modality for the management of various psychiatric disorders. There have been a lot of modifications in the techniques of delivering ECT over decades. Despite lots of criticisms encountered, ECT has still been used commonly in clinical practice due to its safety and efficacy. Research evidences found multiple neuro-biological mechanisms for the therapeutic effect of ECT. ECT brings about various neuro-physiological as well as neuro-chemical changes in the macro- and micro-environment of the brain. Diverse changes involving expression of genes, functional connectivity, neurochemicals, permeability of blood-brain-barrier, alteration in immune system has been suggested to be responsible for the therapeutic effects of ECT. This article reviews different neurobiological mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic efficacy of ECT.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a valuable therapeutic modality in psychiatric clinical practice.1) Development of various pharmacological agents with patient friendly profile restricted the use of ECT in current clinical practice. However, it is still commonly used in the management of depression, acute manic episode, catatonia, and treatment resistant schizophrenia.2) ECT has mood stabilizing property superior than pharmacotherapy in the management of depressive episode, manic episode as well as mixed episode in bipolar affective disorder.3) The therapeutic response achieved through administration of ECT is usually quicker than existing psychotropic medications. The initial use of seizure for a therapeutic purpose (management of psychiatric disorder) was based on an observation which was indicative of an important biological underpinning behind the therapeutic efficacy of ECT. In early part of last century, the glial cell density in the brain of patients suffering from schizophrenia was compared with those with epilepsy. The number of glial cells in the brain of patients with epilepsy was higher than those suffering from schizophrenia, indicating the role of seizure in maintaining the density of glial cells. This biological observation has given birth to the idea that induction of seizure may help in restoring the glial cell number causing improvement in the psychiatric illness.4) ECT was finally developed through series of experiments for seizure induction (initially by injecting epileptogenic chemicals, subsequently using electric stimuli for seizure induction) over past two centuries. Extensive web search in the Medline database using the keywords “Electroconvulsive therapy”, “ECT”, and “Neurobiology” was done. All relevant studies published till the end of July 2016 in English language were analyzed with focus on mechanism of action of ECT.
Seizures induced in human brain were demonstrated to be effective in treating psychiatric disorders as early as initial half of the last century. Yet, how this seizure activity in brain operates to ameliorate neuropsychiatric symptoms is still not completely understood. Since the very inception of electroconvulsive shock (ECS) use in clinical practice, various theories have been proposed to unravel this enigma. Growing knowledge base has helped in safer application of ECT with lesser adverse events, and a better understanding of the underlying mechanism might help in further improvisation of this therapy. Moreover, the importance of knowing the mechanism also lies in the fact that there have been voices raised time and again labeling ECT as inhumane treatment modality, questioning its mechanism of action. Studies have been performed on experimental animals, human subjects as well as cadaveric brain in attempts to elucidate the possible mechanisms.
Numerous psychological, psychoanalytical and biological theories have been put forward as an endeavor to explain the therapeutic effect of ECT. Biological theories proposed, can broadly be classified into neurophysiological, neuro-biochemical, and neuroplasticity theories depending upon the effect of ECS on various aspects (functional, compositional and structural) of brain as well as underlying neuronal and glial tissues. This review aimed at understanding the developments in biological models explaining mechanisms of action of ECT.
The electrical impulse from ECT electrodes traverses through intermediary tissue to stimulate neurons in brain by altering their internal electrical milieu and concentration of ions.5) Group of depolarized neurons fire simultaneously to produce a convulsion, that has been suggested to exert a therapeutic effect in various neuropsychiatric disorders. The factors determining areas of brain that get activated, includes the particulars of seizure (induced), site of electrode placement as well as patient related variables.6,7) Generalized seizure encompasses critical brain structures such as cortex, sub-cortex, thalamus, basal ganglia and limbic system. However, certain brain areas are more strikingly involved than others.8) Notwithstanding these differences, Postictal Suppression Index (PSI) and Burst Suppression (BS) index have been identified as robust measures that can predict adequacy of seizures in ECT. Kranaster et al.9) had reported BS index as a marker comparable with PSI.9) After multiple sessions of ECT the BS index reduces, which reflects the anticonvulsant effect of ECT.9)
A variety of studies have shown ECT to alter the cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism, using neuroimaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) tends to increase immediately in the areas of brain with seizure activity and follows the seizure generalization pattern.6) In addition, the changes in rCBF vary depending on the type of seizure, with generalized seizures causing higher variations in rCBF than missed ones.6,8) There is a subsequent decline in rCBF shortly after ECT-induced seizures.10)
Alterations in global as well as rCBF have been demonstrated in mood disorders, psychosis as well as in population at higher risk of developing psychosis.11,12) Regarding absolute levels of blood flow research findings are inconsistent. This variability might be attributable to the differences in parameters been measured, patient characteristics, illness features, treatment received and the imaging modalities used.13) Mounting evidences in patients with depression (unipolar as well as bipolar depression) indicate significant hypometabolism in frontal gyrus.14,15) Furthermore, Hosokawa et al.14) showed difference in glucose metabolism pattern in patients with bipolar and unipolar depression in the form of hypometabolism in right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the former, and the later exhibiting hypometabolism in right temporal gyrus, right insula, and left cingulate.
There is enormous literature, which supports the notion that ECT brings about changes in rCBF and regional metabolism. A post-ECT reduction in rCBF and glucose utilization in the cortex (particularly in dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex, superior frontal regions and temporal cortex) along with increase in flow across the amygdala, parahippocampal gyri, pons and other limbic/para-limbic structures has been reported in patients with depression.15,16) However, several studies report contradictory findings in this regards. Yatham et al.17) reported no significant change in blood flow. Conversely, increased rCBF had also been reported after an ECT course.18,19) Mervaala et al.18) using SPECT showed increased metabolism in right temporal and bilateral parietal cortices.
Most of the above evidences are suggestive of definite changes in rCBF following ECT in patients suffering from major psychiatric disorders. These amendments in rCBF have association with metabolism in different brain areas which are related to therapeutic outcome.
During the ictal phase of ECT induced seizure, there occurs an up-surge in blood pressure, consequently, there may occur break in the continuity of blood brain barrier (BBB) transiently.20) During this process, certain neuro-chemicals may get released from circulation to brain parenchyma which brings out specific changes (increased brain derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF] levels, angiogenesis, neurogenesis) in the microenvironment of the brain. The breach in BBB occurs only after repeated application of ECS. Accordingly, the alteration in BBB integrity may be unrelated to the brain changes following single session of electroconvulsive stimulus as evident from studies on experimental animals.20)
Electroencephalography (EEG) reflects the functional integrity of the cerebral cortex. EEG changes in specific brain areas during and after ECT may predict about clinical outcome as well as helps in understanding the underlying biological mechanisms of ECT. Studies correlating the therapeutic effect of ECT with EEG changes are limited. Slowing of waveform has been the commonest EEG finding, and might be associated with the clinical outcome. Some evidences suggest post-ECT delta activity in prefrontal cortex as a predictor of clinical response, irrespective of the mode of ECT.21,22) The onset of therapeutic response depends upon the rapidity as well as the extent of slowing of EEG waves.23) The ictal EEG changes on bilateral ECT (in comparison to unilateral ECT) is found to be more synchronous, symmetrical, uniform with high amplitude and have significant post-ictal suppression.24) Differences exist in EEG pattern among different subtypes of depression (unipolar depression, bipolar depression and psychotic depression). These differences in the EEG characteristics fade out with application of ECT.25) A recent study by Zhao et al.26) revealed decrease in alpha activity in the fronto-temporal cortex following a series of ECT. Increase in theta (4–7 Hz) activity was also reported in certain brain areas. McCormick et al.27) using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography analysis, showed sub-genual anterior cingulate cortex (SgACC) as the site of theta activity. Raised theta activity was shown to be associated with decline in psychotic symptoms in patients with psychotic depression. Additionally, the extent of decreased theta activity in the SgACC prior to treatment was positively associated with antipsychotic response of ECT.27)
ECT modulates the process of neurotransmission and influences the expression as well as release of a great variety of neurochemicals in brain including transcription factors, neurotransmitters, neurotrophic factors, and hormones.28) It has an effect on transmission of almost all the major neurotransmitters in brain such as serotonin, dopamine, acetyl-choline, endogenous opioids, epinephrine and nor-epinephrine, etc.29,30) During chemical neurotransmission, it acts at multiple levels including the neurotransmitter synthesis, neurotransmitter release, binding of neurotransmitters to their receptors as well as their reuptake.30)
Animal experiments have revealed altered expression of various target genes following acute as well as serial electroconvulsive stimulations. These genes might encode for various transcription factors, structural proteins as well as neuropeptides found in brain. For instance, Dyrvig et al.31) showed increased expression of genes c-Fos, Egr1, Neuritin 1, BDNF, Snap29, Synaptotagmin III, Synapsin I, Psd95 and Npy in rodent brain post-ECS. Similarly Kaneko et al.32) demonstrated significantly increased expression of TCF7 (transcription factor 7) gene using microarray analysis of mRNA derived from peripheral blood in patients with catatonic schizophrenia following repeated ECT.
The epigenetic modifications brought about by ECT have also been suggested to account for the therapeutic effects of ECT.33) Electroconvulsive activity has been demonstrated to induce the gene Gadd45b (growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible protein 45 beta) that has role in demethylation at the regulatory regions of genes for fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF-1) and BDNF, factors involved in regulation of neurogenesis.34,35) Gadd45b mediates ECT-induced dendritic proliferation in nascent neurons of hippocampal dentate gyrus.35,36)
Electroconvulsive seizure improves neuronal connectivity at the hippocampus. Single electroconvulsive stimulus produces increased expression of specific proteins like—striatal enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP61), which dephosphorylates tyrosine from the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) resulting in internalization of the receptors.37) This physiological change has been observed in the hippocampus of rats.
Electroconvulsive seizures induce transcriptional regulation of various histone proteins, DNA modifying enzymes (DNA methyltransferase and DNA demethylase) and methyl-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-binding proteins within the hippocampus as seen in experimental animals (rats).38) ECT produces remodelling of the chromatins by various mechanisms. The therapeutic effects may be mediated through down-regulation of c-fos and up-regulation of BDNF.39) Another epigenetic mechanism explains the involvement of histone deacetylase enzyme that leads to post-transcriptional changes leading to down-regulation of NMDA receptor signaling pathways leading to effects of ECT.40)
However the evidences explaining possible role of ECT in modifying the epigenetic mechanisms to bring out the therapeutic effect is limited to experimental animals.
There is increasing evidence for role of neurotrophic factors in growth and development of brain structures as well as in pathophysiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. ECT has been shown to change the levels of various biochemical mediators including these neurotrophic factors to effect neuroplastic changes in the brain. This trophic activity involves both neuroprotection as well as increased neuronal proliferation. Even single electroconvulsive stimulus produces proliferation of neurons at the dentate gyrus of hippocampus and newly formed neurons may survive for months.41,42) It has been hypothesized that ECS prevents cell death through activation of survival signal pathways, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic signaling. Animal studies have shown, repeated ECS to increase proliferative signals such as the Cdk2-pRB-E2F1 cell cycle pathway and ERK pathway in brain cortex.43,44) In addition, ECS decreases bcl-XS gene mediated neuronal apoptosis.45) Moreover, ECS produces down regulation of c-Myc, an intracellular protein involved in neuronal apoptosis. c-Myc, promotes apoptosis in response to various stimuli (in association of Bcl-2 group of proteins) and has a regulatory role on cellular proliferation and differentiation.44,46) In the frontal cortex of rat, Jeon et al.44) demonstrated ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of c-Myc after repeated ECS. Bad, a pro-apoptotic factor responsible for apoptosis also got inactivated by ECS. This trophic effect of ECS blocking apoptosis may be responsible for the therapeutic effect.44)
Among neurotropic factors BDNF has been widely studied for its putative role in mediating the effects of ECT. BDNF is a nerve growth factor classified under neurotrophin class, mediates neuronal growth, proliferation, repair and survival.47,48) In rats, Nibuya et al.49) demonstrated ECS to enhance the expression of hippocampal BDNF mRNA. Further pre-clinical studies on rodents support the finding of ECS altering the levels of BDNF, proteins and the tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) mRNA in different brain areas.50) Recent meta-analyses validate low serum BDNF (sBDNF) concentrations in depressed patients which get normalized by ECT and antidepressant treatment. A dose-response effect of ECS on BDNF has also been hypothesized.47,51,52) These studies however disproved consistent association between sBDNF concentrations and the symptom severity or clinical response in depression.47,51) In contrast several researches suggest post-ECT improvements in illness not to be associated with increase in sBDNF levels.53,54) Differential BDNF expression in different areas of brain is believed to be responsible for antidepressant action of electroconvulsive seizures.55) In rats, Taliaz et al.56) demonstrated the antidepressant-like effect of ECT. The effect was more dependent on ECT induced significant reduction of ventral tegmental area (VTA) BDNF expression rather than elevated hippocampal BDNF expression. Earlier researches also pointed to this contrasting BDNF action in the hippocampus and the VTA.56) It has also been hypothesized that BDNF expression differs according to duration post-ECT and further research to establish this correlation has been advised.57)
Studies also show post-ECS increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and basic FGF-2.58–60) There is growing support regarding their involvement in causation of psychiatric illnesses.61–64)
VEGF has a role in endothelial proliferation, angiogenesis, vaso-permeability, and has neurotrophic actions.60) In animal models there had been robust VEGF induction in hippocampus post ECS. VEGF was shown to be essential and sufficient to induce the proliferation of quiescent neural progenitor cell. Genetic variation of VEGF influences human hippocampal morphology suggest that effects of VEGF as reported in rodent models extend to humans.65) Similarly, it was reported to be significantly increased in depressed patients after ECT.66) It has also been hypothesized that VEGF may be involved in increasing antidepressant drug concentration in brain by down-regulating P-glycoprotein (a drug efflux transporter) at the brain-blood barrier.60)
GDNF is a neurotrophic agent from transforming growth factor β (TGF β) family of neurotrophins. It has a role in survival of dopaminergic neurons.67) Low serum GDNF has been reported in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients, levels of which improved following ECT. Zhang et al.68) reported significantly increased serum GDNF levels in MDD patients showing response to ECT. Accordingly, GDNF was hypothesized to have a role in mediating effects of ECT.
Studies have demonstrated down-regulation of expressions of FGF-2 transcripts in MDD, more so in untreated patients. Researchers also proposed FGF-2 to have an endogenous antidepressant and anxiolytic property and its increased expression to promote response to antidepressant therapies.69) Definite evidences for their role in mediating the effect of ECT are lacking, and it has been speculated that increase in the expression might just be an unrelated compensatory response.
Several other biochemical mediators have been proposed to play a role in ECT functioning. A recent study supports the possible involvement of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) for the therapeutic effect of ECT.2) Electrical stimulation of brain enhances the expression of glutamate decarboxylase-65 isoform in the GABAergic neurons releasing TPA, which results in amplification of neurogenesis in limbic system, modulation of synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission.2)
ECT changes blood levels of various other molecules associated with mood disorders such as CD40L, interleukin (IL)-8, IL-13, EGF, insulin like growth factor (IGF)-1, pancreatic polypeptide, stem cell factor, sortilin-1 etc. The changes in blood levels were more prominent after acute ECT treatment. However, robust evidence regarding their role in mediating ECT action is lacking.57)
Ongoing researches hinted towards a possible involvement of immune system in mediating the effects of ECT.29) A higher level of inflammatory mediators and activated immune cells in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been reported in patients with depression.70) Polymorphisms in genes related to immune system may predispose individuals to develop major depression. Inflammatory mediators implicated include C-reactive protein, IL-6, IL-1, and tumor necrosis factor α, etc. Similar pro-inflammatory states have been described in other psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia. Dysregulation of these immune mediators have been suggested to alter neurotransmitter synthesis and their blood levels through alterations in tryptophan-kynurenine pathway.71) Moreover, Guloksuz et al.72) have shown ECT to favour metabolites with neuro-protective properties. ECT temporarily increases expression of certain inflammatory cytokine genes. However, multiple sessions of ECT leads to a decline in the levels of inflammatory mediators.
ECT has been hypothesized to enhance release of hormones from hypothalamus into CSF and blood through excitation of diencephalic structures.73) There is a transient and selective increase in secretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone, cortisol and prolactin that returns to baseline in few hours following ECT. Evidences indicate disturbed levels of stress hormones in patients with mood disorder. In patients with depression, studies have consistently reported HPA axis hyper-function. This is evident in form of elevated cortisol levels and decreased cortisol suppression on dexamethasone suppression test. High cortisol levels have negative impact on neurogenesis, gliogenesis and are related to atrophy of structures such as hippocampus.74) The zone nearby node of Ranvier (i.e., paranode) in neurons has been suggested to be especially vulnerable to corticosteroids and stress related injury. It is considered as a crucial site of glial-neuronal interaction and dysfunctions there might result in neuropsychiatric manifestations.75) ECT has been shown to reduce the cortisol levels to normal among patients with MDD in due course. Whether these changes in levels of hormones have therapeutic implications or are manifestations of ECS related stress and to secondary other changes in brain is still unclear.73) It is also not known for sure that how changes in hormone levels affect amelioration of symptoms related to psychiatric illnesses. However, ECT has been demonstrated to reduce cortisol induced inhibition of neuroplasticity.76,77)
Disturbed monoaminergic neurotransmission has been proposed since long in depressed patients. Post mortem studies have demonstrated increased α2-adrenoceptor binding due to decreased release of noradrenaline in brain of suicide victims. Results from studies on rodents suggest that the therapeutic effect of ECS may be mediated through an increased release of noradrenaline indicated by a compensatory reduction in α2-adrenoceptor binding.78) The decreases in α2-adrenoceptor binding were more pronounced in areas of frontal cortex having robust connections with amygdala and hippocampus, the structures involved in processing of emotions and memory, respectively. In MDD patients dopamine transporter binding is reduced in the substantia nigra, striatum, thalamus, and anterior cingulate. ECT series has been shown to elevate levels of CSF homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, the metabolites of monoamine neurotransmitters.79) Transiently increased dopamine receptor binding has also been reported.80) Moreover, ECT has been proposed to modulate dopaminergic receptors and enhance dopamine neurotransmission in brain.
Serotonergic neurotransmitter system is well known to have implications in disorders of mood and psychosis. Various antidepressants targeting this system have been developed. Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) and norepinephrine transporter (NET182C) polymorphisms have been suggested to be associated with ECT treatment response.81) However, studies conducted on rodents in past using radio-ligands or measuring serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) release have provided ambiguous results regarding effect of ECS on receptor sensitivity.82) Findings of human studies measuring post ECT blunting of cortisol response over 5-HT1A receptor agonist treatment were also contradicting. Researchers reported both increased response as well as no change in 5-HT1A receptor sensitivity. Antidepressant medications are associated with initial decline in 5-HT1A receptor down-regulation, before resetting of serotonergic system occurs in neurons. Likewise, a recent PET study on MDD patients showed a post ECT decrease in 5-HT1A receptor binding in various brain areas such as orbito-frontal cortex, ACC, hippocampus and amygdala.83) However, Saijo et al.82) using [carbonyl-11C]-WAY100635 a 5-HT1A antagonist with high affinity, reported unchanged 5-HT1A receptor binding in depressed patients receiving ECT. Moreover, a study using neuroendocrine challenge test in patients undergoing ECT, could not find association between illness improvement and serotonergic function.84) Similar to antidepressants, ECT also down-regulates 5-HT2 receptors globally, in the brain of patients with MDD.85) Reduction in 5-HT2 receptor density is suggested to have antidepressant action. Robust evidences for the direct involvement of serotonergic system in ECT are lacking at this point of time. Further research in this domain might throw light on implications of serotonergic system in ECT action.
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has roles in emotional regulation, processing of memory, maintaining circadian rhythms, and regulation of appetite. Moreover, it also has anticonvulsant action and gets released in response to seizure stimulation. This effect is achieved through inhibitory effect of NPY on glutamatergic neurons. Diminished NPY levels have been reported in various psychiatric disorders such as depression with suicidality, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.86) Repetitive spontaneous seizures have been shown to be associated with increased expression of NPY mRNA and peptide release throughout the mossy fiber pathway in cortex as well as hippocampus, not found otherwise.87) ECT has been shown to be associated with elevated NPY levels in CSF of patients with depression.79) Present evidences suggest that NPY may be involved with mechanism of action of ECT.
Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter in human brain. Excessive release of glutamate is associated with overstimulation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors leading to calcium influx inside neurons subsequently causing excitotoxic neuronal damage. The cystine glutamate antiporter located on astrocytes is involved in cystine uptake into cell in return for glutamate release. Cystine gets reduced to cysteine, a substrate for the synthesis of glutathione which has antioxidant properties. Extracellular glutamate excess competitively prevents cystine uptake inside cell, triggering oxidative stress related cellular death.88) Increased glutamate/GABA ratio was observed in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in rodent model of depression (learned helplessness).89) Elevated glutamate levels in frontal cortex were also reported through post-mortem studies.90) Contrarily, other researchers have demonstrated reduced glutamate levels in dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) as well as in ACC in patients with depression.91,92) However, a recent study in depressed patients elucidated distinct glutamate levels in different areas of brain.93,94) Bernard et al.95) demonstrated significantly altered expression of glutamate receptor and transporter gene on post-mortem analysis of locus ceruleus in levels in MDD patients. In MDD patients, altered expression of glutamate receptors genes in hippocampus has also been reported.96) Furthermore, impaired AMPA receptor mediated glutamatergic neurotransmission has been shown in patients with schizophrenia.97) Thus, altered glutamatergic transmission has been implicated to have role in psychiatric disorders.
Dong et al.98) in experiment on rats showed ECT to lower down the levels of increased glutamate significantly in hippocampus of depressed animals. Moreover, stimulation threshold of NMDA receptors was reduced and the expression of NMDA receptor was up-regulated in the rat brain following ECT.98) Similarly, ECT has been reported to rectify glutamatergic alterations in specific areas of brain (i.e., DLPFC) in patients with depression.92,99) In addition, ECT increases glutamate levels in subgenual ACC and lowers the levels in left hippocampus in patients with depression. This glutamate normalizing action of ECT relates with improvement in disorders of mood.93)
In psychiatric disorders alterations in volume of brain structures has been consistently reported. Studies have also demonstrated ECT to trigger changes in volume of whole brain as well as its components such as gray matter, white matter and other brain structures.100,101) These changes are more pronounced in areas with greater connection to prefrontal cortex and other limbic structures involved in regulation of mood.102–104) ECT brings about neuroplastic changes at synapse (synaptogenesis), neurons (neurogenesis), dendrites (dendrogenesis), vasculature (angiogenesis), as well as glial cells and their processes (gliogenesis). Neuroplastic changes have been noticed as early as after a single electroconvulsive stimulus. In rodents, ECS enhances markers of glial activation within hours of its application.105) In experimental animals, repeated ECS instigates long lasting, mossy fiber sprouting in limbic structures of brain. This change was not associated with neuronal loss, ruling out it being just a compensatory activity.106) ECT in rodents (rats) may produce 30% increase in the population of endothelial cell by means of endothelial cell proliferation.107) The increase in angiogenesis may be related to the metabolic activity of specific brain regions.
A great deal of research has been performed pertaining to the neuroplastic effect of ECT in patients with MDD. Moreover, significant modulations in volume of brain substructures such as hippocampus, amygdala, anterior cingulate gyrus and medial and inferior temporal cortex have been reported with ECT.101,108–110) However, the evidences regarding nature and extent of alterations as well as their correlation with response are contradicting.
In patients with MDD, MRI studies have reported increase in hippocampal volume (normalization) after a course of ECT.101,102) The ECT induced incremental changes in volume of hippocampus as well as amygdala can be observed within 72 hours of treatment initiation. Furthermore, smaller baseline hippocampus volume had been suggested to be associated with greater post ECT clinical response.103) However, several other studies do not support this finding.111,112) Abbott et al.102) showed ECT response and symptom improvement to be associated with increase in hippocampal functional connectivity (FC) rather than change in hippocampal volume. Additionally, FC changes were not found to correlate with hippocampal volume changes.
Several researches have also reported significant volume change in amygdala with ECT.103) Moreover, pretreatment volume as well as extent of enlargement had been suggested to relate with improvement of clinical symptoms of depression. Ota et al.101) reported change in right amygdala volume to relate with improvement of clinical symptoms of depression. Instead, Ten Doesschate et al.111) held left amygdala volume to have a greater predictive value. However, evidences regarding these associations are conflicting and require further exploration.
Neuroimaging studies have also revealed, ECT to modify the FC of brain areas. Mounting evidences suggest alterations in connectivity within functional networks as well as between distinct networks, among patients with depression. These networks are associated with top down regulation of attention and mood (fronto-parietal network), processing of emotion (the affective network and the ventral attention network) as well as internally or externally oriented attention (default mode [DM] network and dorsal attention network).113) In depression communication is impaired in both task-negative and task-positive networks. Studies have shown hyperconnectivity pattern in DM network in depression.113,114) Connolly et al.115) studied resting state FC of SgACC in patients with MDD and revealed increased FC of SgACC with amygdala as well as insula. Moreover, connectivity was decreased between the SgACC and left precuneus; thus, highlighting impairment in above mentioned networks.115) Reduction of FC within fronto-parietal network also occurs in patients with MDD.113) Likewise, altered FC in DM network, salience network (the affective network and the ventral attention network) and dorsal attention network has been demonstrated in patients with schizophrenia.116,117)
ECT normalizes resting state FC of brain networks.102,118) It has been shown to normalize decreased hippocampal connectivity in patients with MDD. Furthermore, the elevation of connectivity was reported to correlate with symptom improvement in depression.102) The decline in resting-state FC has been observed as early as after single ECT session.104) ECT was also shown to normalize (by increasing) network connectivity between posterior DM and dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) as well as between posterior DM and left DLPFC.119) Connectivity in parahippocampal gyri as well as VMPFC, the components of DM, subsides to normalize with ECT.120) The DM network have implications in depressive ruminations and impaired top-down regulation; thus, normalizing changes in FC may help in ameliorating symptoms of depression.119,121) Cano et al.104) reported decreased FC between intra-limbic structures (amygdala and SgACC) and increased FC between limbic–prefrontal networks (right amygdala and right DLPFC) after ECT. They suggested that FC changes occur initially in intra-limbic networks and subsequently extend to limbic-prefrontal networks. Changes in resting state FC in several brain structures (such as ACC, thalamus and hippocampus) are associated both with ECT application as well as clinical improvement.118) Accordingly, of the various FC changes that occur with ECT all might not be specific to a diagnosis or relate with clinical improvement.122)
Decades of research performed to elucidate the mechanism of ECT outlined a vast field of study that may involve numerous intricate biologic processes, including alterations in neuroplasticity, levels of various neurotrophic factors and neurotransmitters, FC, immune mechanisms, neuroendocrine function as well as epigenetic processes. Despite the evidences explaining neurobiological mechanisms of ECT, inconsistent research findings preclude from drawing firm inferences. This attributable to lacunae in present literature, such as lack of homogeneity in research methodology and study population, small to moderate sample size and lack of control group in numerous studies. Moreover, the cause-effect relationship between findings and therapeutic effects of ECT could not be established with absolute certainty and even it is also not very prudent to assume about a single mechanism that can explain the therapeutic effect of ECT.
The future researches focusing on neurobiologic mechanisms of ECT need to address following areas of concern; use of control groups, homogenous study methodology in a larger study population and to attend the grey areas where contrasting evidences exist.