Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2015; 13(2): 224-225  https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2015.13.2.224
Erratum: Figure Correction
Anupa A. Vijayakumari1,2, John P. John1,2,4, Harsha N. Halahalli3,*, Pradip Paul2, Priyadarshini Thirunavukkarasu1,2, Meera Purushottam2, and Sanjeev Jain2
1Multimodal Brain Image Analysis Laboratory (MBIAL), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India, 2Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India, 3Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India, 4Department of Clinical Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
Correspondence to: John P. John, MD, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), PB No 2900 Dharmaram P.O., Hosur Road, Bangalore Karnataka 560 029, India, Tel: +091-80-26995329/26995250, Fax: +091-80-26564492/26564822, E-mail: jpjnimhans@gmail.com
Published online: August 31, 2015.
© The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Body

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2015;13(1):68?82

In the published article “Vijayakumari AA, et al. Effect of polymorphisms of three genes mediating monoamine signalling on brain morphometry in schizophrenia and healthy subjects. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2015;13(1):68?82. http://dx.doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2015.13.1.68”, the data in Fig. 1A and Fig. 2A was given incorrectly. The Editorial Office of Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci would like to correct the typographic errors as bellow. We apologizes for any inconvenience that it may have caused.

  • 1. The extent threshold k value given in SPMresults of Fig. 1A is erroneously given as k=20; instead it should read as k=793 voxels as mentioned in the table legend.

  • 2. The extent threshold k value given in SPMresults of Fig. 2A is erroneously given as k=20; instead it should read as k=988 voxels as mentioned in the table legend.



This Article


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Services
Social Network Service

e-submission

Archives